| BoxingTalk Story |
By G. Leon
25/01/2007
GL: Can you give us some thoughts on Vitali Klitschko making his comeback and the WBC allegedly allowing him to come back against Maskaev? "First of all we're pleased that Vitali has the urge to fight again. We welcome him. He's always been a good guy and he's a professional. I don't hold anything against warrior who wants to do this again. But if he continues to try to step on and interfere with Samuel Peter's rights to fight Oleg Maskaev, then I have a problem with what Vitali is trying to do. That doesn't just go for Vitali. It goes for Maskaev and the WBC , and every other representative of any other party involved of what I believe to be a conspiracy and a methodical plan and venture to screw Samuel Peter's rights. None of us will stand for it, and there's been talks of the WBC granting Vitali's request to allow him to fight for the title before Samuel's mandatory is enforced. There's obviously many forces at work here trying to do that. I have a glimmer of hope that the WBC will do the right thing here, but at the same time I'm realistic and I know what's going on here. We're very prepared with a very heavy hitting legal team to go after anyone trying to interfere with Samuel's rights. All we're asking is for the WBC to do the right thing and honor what they've said in the past. If Maskaev doesn't want to fight Samuel, let him go fight Vitali for no title, that's their perogative. But Samuel has earned his right to fight for the title.Send questions and comments to: gleon@boxingtalk.com